![]() | |||
| Student 12 is also part of the pink group. When writing her words, she took the time to sound out the words and recognized that the underlined words had the same sound she studied for that week. |
Student 12 works hard to improve her spelling on a daily basis. She is quick to sound out words. Based on her remarks, she continues to use sounding out sounds and syllables as her main method for spelling unfamiliar words. She even goes so far as to make the connection of sounds heard to the current week's spelling patterns. Invernizz & Hayes (2004) state “that the process of comparing and contrasting orthographic features not only teaches the spelling of specific words but also encourages students to make generalizations about the spelling consistency of other words within a given category (p. 224). Student 12 is recognizing that when she hears the ow sound that it could be spelled using the letters ow or ou. She made that generalization independently when writing this sentence. Student 13 made a similar correct generalization, however, she stated her generalization was made based on daily spelling activities.
Student 11 made drew accurate conclusions when spelling the underlined words related to his spelling patterns. Schlagal (2002) states “[s]orting and manipulating these lists of words by their patterns provides a powerful dimension of interest and focus to a week’s instructional sequence and can help children to see and understand the orthographic structures they are studying” (p. 54). Student 11 immediately recognized and was able to clearly state the specific spelling patterns he was studying for that week and how these new words fell into the categories. Even though Student 21 stated it was due to sounding out sounds. I do believe he is seeing and understanding the specific features he is studying each week. However, I believe that he is subconsciously translating these new features into his writing.
Both of these articles strongly support my decision to differentiate spelling among my students as well as choose lists that focus on specific features. With much practice, students are beginning to translate these spelling features into their writing. For more information on these articles, I provided the citations below. I am excited to interview my two students this week and ask more detailed questions.
Invernizzi, M., & Hayes, L.
(2004). Developmental-spelling research: A systematic imperative. Reading
Research Quarterly, 39(2), 216-228.
Schlagal, B. (2002). Classroom spelling instruction: History, research, and
practice. Reading Research and
Instruction, 42(1).




I am right there with you as far as differentiating spelling based on student needs- It only seems to make sense!I like how you included the articles that support your findings. I need to start doing this with my blog.
ReplyDeleteI am getting more nervous as the analyzing goes. I think you are further along with me with analyzing. My next step is field notes.
It is great that your students are starting to make generalizations about spelling and patterns. I am sure your data will prove your ideas about differentiated spelling!
I agree with Kate, the way you included the article was good! I intend to go back and add some of this ot my previous posts. I know the research is there, just need to plug it in. :) I really like how you have all the students write that out individually. Great source of data collection.
ReplyDeleteThe research is definitely there. I have not been very good about including articles in my posts and will also need to plug articles back into older posts to support my findings.
ReplyDelete